Reading Passage:
Title: "The Theory of Human Evolution: Evidence and Insights"
The theory of human evolution through natural selection has been widely accepted in the field of anthropology. Researchers have accumulated substantial evidence to support this theory, which explains the gradual development of Homo sapiens from earlier hominid species. Fossil records, in particular, provide invaluable insights into the progression of human ancestors.
One key piece of evidence is the discovery of hominid fossils that demonstrate a clear evolutionary timeline. For instance, the unearthing of Australopithecus afarensis specimens, such as "Lucy," showcases the transition from bipedal apes to upright-walking hominids. Additionally, the gradual increase in cranial capacity observed in Homo habilis and subsequent species further substantiates the theory of gradual evolution.
Moreover, genetic studies have shed light on the relatedness of modern humans to other primates. Comparative DNA analysis has revealed striking similarities between human and chimpanzee genomes, supporting the common ancestry hypothesis. These findings strengthen the case for evolution through natural selection as the most plausible explanation for the emergence of Homo sapiens.
Listening Transcript:
Professor: In the reading, we learned about the theory of human evolution through natural selection and the fossil evidence that supports it. However, I have some doubts about certain aspects of this theory.
First, while the fossil records indeed provide insights into the progression of human ancestors, we should acknowledge that these records are incomplete. There are significant gaps in our knowledge, and the interpretation of fossil findings can be subjective. For example, the classification of some fossils as transitional forms is still a matter of debate among researchers.
Furthermore, the genetic evidence presented in the reading, which highlights the similarities between human and chimpanzee genomes, is not without its challenges. Yes, there are similarities, but there are also key differences that raise questions about the extent of our shared ancestry. The genetic code is incredibly complex, and drawing definitive conclusions about evolution solely from genetic data is a complex task.
Question:
Summarize the points made by the professor in the listening passage. Explain how these points cast doubt on specific aspects of the theory of human evolution presented in the reading passage.
My Answer:
Both the reading passage and the professor discuss about human evolution. The reading passage gives two evidence to support that human evolution is true. On the other hand, the professor casts doubt about those evidence. Their arguments would be summarize on the following paragraphs.
First, the reading passage claims unearthed fossils are solid evidence that human is true evolved. “Lucy”, the Australopithecus afarensis fossil shows the transition from bipedal ape to upright-waling hominid. Furthermore the reading passage argues the facts that cranial capacity is increased on the observed fossils. However, the professor arguing this arguments. He believes that fossil records mostly are incomplete and have significant gap on it. Moreover, he explaining this transitional fossil still on high debate by many scholars and researchers.
Secondly, according to the reading passage there are a high similarities of DNA genome between human and chimpanzee, thus conclude to supports ancestry hypothesis. Meanwhile, the professor does not deny the similarities but he has different perspective. He arguing the complex challenges on genome analysis, there are key differences between Human’s DNA and chimpanzee DNA. According to him, genetic is very complex field, it is not wise to conclude solely from this complex task.
To sum up, both the reading passage and the professor give reasonable arguments regarding whether human is evolved or not. Actually their arguments are not mutually exclusive, it could be complete each other in order seeking the truth. Researches should continue to solve this one of the most big question on human being.
Please assess my response based on this:
The TOEFL iBT® Writing Scoring Rubric—Integrated Tasks is used to evaluate responses based on different levels of performance. Here is a breakdown of each level:
Score 5: A response at this level demonstrates a successful selection of important information from the lecture and presents it coherently and accurately in relation to the relevant information presented in the reading. The response is well organized, and occasional language errors, if any, do not result in inaccurate or imprecise presentation of content or connections.
Score 4: A response at this level generally selects the important information from the lecture and presents it coherently and accurately in relation to the relevant information in the reading. However, there may be minor omissions, inaccuracies, vagueness, or imprecision in some content from the lecture or in connection to points made in the reading. The response may also have more frequent or noticeable minor language errors, as long as they do not significantly impact clarity or the connection of ideas.
Score 3: A response at this level includes some important information from the lecture and conveys a somewhat relevant connection to the reading. However, it may be marked by one or more of the following: vague, global, unclear, or somewhat imprecise connection of the points made in the lecture to points made in the reading; omission of one major key point made in the lecture; incomplete, inaccurate, or imprecise key points or connections between the lecture and the reading; and errors of usage and/or grammar that result in vague expressions or obscured meanings in conveying ideas and connections.
Score 2: A response at this level contains some relevant information from the lecture but is marked by significant language difficulties, significant omission or inaccuracy of important ideas from the lecture, or weak connections between the lecture and the reading. It may significantly misrepresent or completely omit the overall connection between the lecture and the reading, omit or misrepresent important points from the lecture, or contain language errors or expressions that largely obscure connections or meaning, particularly for readers not familiar with the reading and the lecture.
Score 1: A response at this level is marked by one or more of the following: little or no meaningful or relevant coherent content from the lecture, and a language level so low that it is difficult to derive meaning from the response.
Score 0: A response at this level simply copies sentences from the reading, rejects the topic, is not connected to the topic, is written in a foreign language, consists of keystroke characters, or is blank.
These different levels provide a framework for evaluating the quality of responses in integrated tasks for the TOEFL iBT® Writing section.
ChatGPT assessment:
Your response does a decent job of summarizing the points made by the professor and relating them to the reading passage. You successfully capture the essence of the professor's skepticism about the fossil record and genetic evidence for human evolution. However, there are several areas where your response could be improved.
1. Language and Grammar: The grammatical and syntactic errors in your response can make it difficult for the reader to follow your argument at times. Phrases like "human is true evolved," "the professor arguing this arguments," or "it could be complete each other in order seeking the truth" are either grammatically incorrect or unclear, and they detract from the overall clarity of your response.
2. Coherence and Organization: While you generally address the points made by the professor, the structure and flow of your response could be more cohesive. Your paragraphs tend to jump between points without clear transitions, which could confuse the reader.
3. Detail and Specificity: Your summary is somewhat vague in describing the professor's skepticism. For example, you say, "the professor arguing this arguments," but you could more precisely state that the professor questions the completeness and interpretation of the fossil record. You might also include that the professor does not deny the similarities in human and chimpanzee DNA but challenges the idea that this evidence alone is sufficient for drawing conclusions about human evolution.
Considering the TOEFL iBT® Writing Scoring Rubric—Integrated Tasks, I would likely rate your response at a Score 3. You include some important information and make a somewhat relevant connection to the reading, but your answer is marked by language errors and vague expressions that could obscure the meaning and connections for the reader. Improving your grammatical accuracy and providing more specific and clearer explanations would likely elevate your score.
0 Response to "TOEFL IBT Writing practice #35"
Posting Komentar